The Long Now, Stewart Brand and China
September 23rd, 2006
As I noted in an earlier post a good friend recently turned me on to The Long Now Foundation which hopes to provide a counterpoint to today’s “faster/cheaper” mind set and promote “slower/better” thinking. Last week it offered free seminar in San Francisco by Orville Schell, Dean of the Graduate School of Journalism at UC Berkeley titled, ”China Thinks Long-Term, But Can It Re-Learn To Act Long-Term?.” I was not able to attend, but my friend was. I am excited to listen to the actual pod cast once they post it (November 1 edit: it has now been posted!). Below is the synopsis of his presentation that my friend emailed to me.
“China is the most unresolved nation of consequence in the world,” Orville Schell began. It is defined by its massive contradictions. And by its massiveness — China’s population is estimated to be 1.25 to 1.3 billion; the margin of error in the estimate is greater than the population of France. It has 160 cities with a population over one million (the US has 49). It has the world’s largest standing army. No society in the world has more millennia in its history, and for most of that history China looked back. Then in the 20th century the old dynastic cycles were replaced by one social cancellation after another until 1949, when Mao set the country toward the vast futuristic vision of Communism. That “mad experiment” ended with Deng Xiaoping’s effective counter-revolution in the 1980s, which unleashed a new totalistic belief, this time in the market.So what you have now is a society sick of grand visions, in search of another way to be, focussed on the very near term.These days you cannot think usefully about China and its potential futures without holding in your mind two utterly contradictory views of what is happening there. On the one hand, a robust and awesomely growing China; on the other hand a brittle China, parts of it truly hellish.
ROBUST CHINA:
- Peaceful borders in all directions
- Economic, non-threatening engagement with the entire world, including with societies the US refuses to deal with
- 200 million Chinese raised out of poverty
- Private savings rate of 40 percent (it’s 1 percent in the US)
- 300 million people with cell phones, and the best cell phone service in the world
- A superb freeway system built almost overnight
- New building construction everywhere, and some of it is brilliant
- 150 million people online
- 350,000 engineering graduates a year
- One-third of the world’s direct investment
- Huge trade surplus
- And an economic growth rate of 9 to 12 percent a year! For decades.
but also…
BRITTLE CHINA:
- Not much arable land, so a growing dependence on imported food
- Two-thirds of energy production is from dirty coal, by dirty methods, growing at the rate of 1-2 new coal-fired plants per week
- 30 percent of China has acid rain; 75 percent of lakes are polluted and rivers are polluted or pumped dry
- Of the 20 most polluted cities in the world, 16 are in China; you don’t see the sun any more
- Some industrial parts of China are barren, hellish wastes
- Driven by environmental horrors and by widespread corruption, there were 87,000 instances of social unrest last year, going up every year
- The population is aging rapidly, with no pension or welfare, and a broken healthcare system
- The stock markets are grossly manipulated
- Public and official amnesia about historical legacies such as Tiananmen Square in 1989
How can such contradictions be reconciled? The best everyone can hope for is steady piecemeal change. For the Chinese the contradictions don’t really bite so long as they have continued economic growth to focus on and to absorb some of the problems. But what happens when there’s a break in that growth? It could come from inside China or from outside (such as a disruption in the US economy).
It’s hard to look at the China boom now without thinking about the Japan boom in the 1970s and ’80s, remembering how everyone knew the Japanese were going dominate the US and world economy, and we all had to study Japanese methods to learn how to compete. Then that went away, and it hasn’t come back.
The leadership of China is highly aware of the environmental problems and is enlightened and ambitious about green solutions, but that attitude does not yet extend beyond the leadership, and until it does, not much can happen.
That’s China: huge, consequential for everybody, and profoundly unresolved.
–Stewart Brand
Entry Filed under: Pre-Departure, Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, China, Misc., Post Trip Wrap-Up re: China
2 Comments Add your own
1. John Wu | September 23rd, 2006 at 5:24 pm
Excellent topic and very informative posting!
Many of China’s challenges, problems, and potential consequences arise from her rapid modernization (read Americanization, imitating everything American from highway construction standards to tanning salons), snail pace of management development, and lack of consensual visions from the bottom of society on how to build this great country. In her economic development or the open-door policy that introduced capitalism to enterpreneurial Chinese, China unleashed a tiger that overcame centuries of sleepiness and leapt into the 21rst century overnight. Old buildings, hutongs, city walls were torn down and replaced by either Russian style utilitarian brick buildings or modern skyscrappers (Beijing has more than 800 buildings that are over 20 stories). Narrow country roads and farm houses are replaced by crisscrossing highways at the rate two, three times the way America built its highways in the 50’s. World’s newest, best, most expensive “things” from Bentleys and Ferraris to Viagras and Scotch to Harvards and Cambridges are imported into China. China wanted to be number 1 in everything they do after managers and politicans read Jack Welch’s strategic thinking at GE. However, the high speed bullet train is running on tracks built in the steam engine era. China is unable to manage traffic in many cities (to solve the traffic problems during the 2008 Olympics, all Beijing companies are required to give a two week holiday to all employees and all private cars are banned to drive on the streets near Olympic venues!), has no way of dealing with bicycle thieves and subway pickpockets, and still thinks the only way to control rabies is to kill all the dogs in the area (news reports August 06; some 50,000 dogs were killed when rabies were reported in Yunnan, owners have the choice of turning in their dogs and have them killed more humanely or risk of having them found, dragged to the street, and skulls crushed in front of them). Walking around in any Chinese city and you will find yourself surrounded by noise, pollution, street litter, and people who spit all the time. The hardware is here but the software has not been invented.
What Brand said about China is very true: huge, consequential, and profoundly unresolved. Moving forward, China ought to pause and think through whether success is only measured by economic growth and per capita income, citizens ought to band together and voice their concerns to the government and policy makers, and human capital ought to be developed so that a society of management capabilities, science, trust, and civility can be built. It takes time and thoughtful debates but isn’t slower and better in vogue?
2. Chris Carr | September 24th, 2006 at 5:34 pm
Good insight, John. Thanks for sharing this!
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed