<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Role of Women in Chinese Economic Activity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://calpolymbatrip.com/2006/china/the-role-of-women-in-chinese-economic-activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2006/china/the-role-of-women-in-chinese-economic-activity/</link>
	<description>The MBA Graduate Program at Cal Poly</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: JingWei Xian</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2006/china/the-role-of-women-in-chinese-economic-activity/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>JingWei Xian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/2006/china/the-role-of-women-in-chinese-economic-activity/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Elisabeth, I heard about the "three highs", too. The "high age" was a result of direct translation from Chinese to English. What it means is aging problem, typically past the prime time of getting marry, which is generally 25-32.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elisabeth, I heard about the &#8220;three highs&#8221;, too. The &#8220;high age&#8221; was a result of direct translation from Chinese to English. What it means is aging problem, typically past the prime time of getting marry, which is generally 25-32.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Carr</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2006/china/the-role-of-women-in-chinese-economic-activity/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Carr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 05:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/2006/china/the-role-of-women-in-chinese-economic-activity/#comment-200</guid>
		<description>Here is a recent SSRN paper of possible interest you can download for free ("&lt;a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=876601"&gt;Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes&lt;/a&gt;?"), which relates to part of our discussion thread above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a recent SSRN paper of possible interest you can download for free (&#8221;<a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=876601">Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes</a>?&#8221;), which relates to part of our discussion thread above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elisabeth Suiter</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2006/china/the-role-of-women-in-chinese-economic-activity/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Elisabeth Suiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 04:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/2006/china/the-role-of-women-in-chinese-economic-activity/#comment-191</guid>
		<description>In case anyone is still reading this thread, I thought I would add something.  I talked to a girl from Beijing and asked her many questions.  Luckily, she seemed excited to answer.

From her I learned that yes, families sometimes believe that men can do more farm work than women, but she does not see families still relying on that too much.  A child of either sex is successful if he or she studies hard, so whether a daughter or son is born to you doesn't truly matter much anymore.  She says that as a female, the last thing you want to do is be a housewife and depend on a man, for one becuase there aren't really enough men to go around and this life strategy can be disasterous.  She said there are many women who are highly educated and never marry, something which she says is not stygmatized at all.  She called them something like the "3 highs" because they have high education, high income, and high age (I am not 100% sure I know what she meant with "high age").  

In addition, I learned that the one child policy is not as uniform as we believe it is, or at least as I believed it was.  She says if both parents come from a single-child family, they can have two kids.

I found this extremely interesting, so I thought I'd share. 
This comes from a 21-year-old girl who studies at Peking University, finishing her bachelor's and has already been accepted to their Master's program with full tuition waved. 

One last thing I want to mention, because she said this Chinese saying to me and I can't get it out of my mind: "Knowledge changes fate".  I think that absolutely hits home for me, and just wanted to pass this on because I feel that is a very powerful saying and explains so much about their culture, but can also be applied to our own lives at this point in time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case anyone is still reading this thread, I thought I would add something.  I talked to a girl from Beijing and asked her many questions.  Luckily, she seemed excited to answer.</p>
<p>From her I learned that yes, families sometimes believe that men can do more farm work than women, but she does not see families still relying on that too much.  A child of either sex is successful if he or she studies hard, so whether a daughter or son is born to you doesn&#8217;t truly matter much anymore.  She says that as a female, the last thing you want to do is be a housewife and depend on a man, for one becuase there aren&#8217;t really enough men to go around and this life strategy can be disasterous.  She said there are many women who are highly educated and never marry, something which she says is not stygmatized at all.  She called them something like the &#8220;3 highs&#8221; because they have high education, high income, and high age (I am not 100% sure I know what she meant with &#8220;high age&#8221;).  </p>
<p>In addition, I learned that the one child policy is not as uniform as we believe it is, or at least as I believed it was.  She says if both parents come from a single-child family, they can have two kids.</p>
<p>I found this extremely interesting, so I thought I&#8217;d share.<br />
This comes from a 21-year-old girl who studies at Peking University, finishing her bachelor&#8217;s and has already been accepted to their Master&#8217;s program with full tuition waved. </p>
<p>One last thing I want to mention, because she said this Chinese saying to me and I can&#8217;t get it out of my mind: &#8220;Knowledge changes fate&#8221;.  I think that absolutely hits home for me, and just wanted to pass this on because I feel that is a very powerful saying and explains so much about their culture, but can also be applied to our own lives at this point in time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Begley</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2006/china/the-role-of-women-in-chinese-economic-activity/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Begley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 00:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/2006/china/the-role-of-women-in-chinese-economic-activity/#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Here's a recent interesting article from the Economist that touches on this subject: &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=6800723" rel="nofollow"&gt;Women in the Workforce: The Importance of Sex&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

(As a side note, I find the title's double entendre to be dangerously close to offensive.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a recent interesting article from the Economist that touches on this subject: <i><a href="http://economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=6800723" rel="nofollow">Women in the Workforce: The Importance of Sex</a></i></p>
<p>(As a side note, I find the title&#8217;s double entendre to be dangerously close to offensive.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wu</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2006/china/the-role-of-women-in-chinese-economic-activity/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/2006/china/the-role-of-women-in-chinese-economic-activity/#comment-154</guid>
		<description>Interesting and insightful discourse here. I plan to present a few slides on the 24 hours of a Chinese businessman and the 24 hours of a Chinese businesswoman in May when I go to SLO. I hope I can shed some light on how the new (upper) middle class in China is faring.

Regarding JingWei's experiences and observations of child rearing in China and Elisabeth's similar experience (and Gary's quote about furthuring individuals vs. family), one has to read Richard Dawkin's ground breaking work in 1976, She Selfish Gene, to understand why that's the case. The book also helps explain why grandparents are often involved in bringing up their offsprings. In America, we have a highly developed, specialist-oriented post-industrial society where we outsource almost everything. The role of the family needs to be reexamined here as every service and function a family provides as an economic unit can be purchased, sometimes more cheaply, from outside. We hire nannies, send kids to schools, have a teacher/coach for anything from piano and violin and soccer, tennis, and modeling, use an entourage of gardeners, plumbers, carpenters, handymen to maintain our houses, and work with a psychiatrist because we don't now how to discipline kids (please watch the cable show "Honey we are killing the kids"). In China, generalists still rule and women perform the many and various duties in their society.

Finally, what's the meaning of life? Are advances in economics the same as advances in culture? Can a poor country develop highly advanced civilization? Can poor men (and women) be happy or happier than their richer counterparts? It's NOT how much one makes; it's how much one buys the many neccessities and indulgences every month and how much one saves in the end of the month that matters. $5000 a month here will leave you nothing in the end of the month (Americans savings rates are around -0.5% in 2005) while 5000RMB a month in China (RMB is a mere 1/8 of USD) will likely buy all the luxuries of a middle class living, a moderate house, a small car maybe, and a whopping 40% savings rate! So, who is richer?

While we are not likely to see the real China in this trip, we will experience what many Chinese experience, even though they live in the three most advanced cities, in their everyday life. We will discover how affordable life can be outside of our 4-star hotels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting and insightful discourse here. I plan to present a few slides on the 24 hours of a Chinese businessman and the 24 hours of a Chinese businesswoman in May when I go to SLO. I hope I can shed some light on how the new (upper) middle class in China is faring.</p>
<p>Regarding JingWei&#8217;s experiences and observations of child rearing in China and Elisabeth&#8217;s similar experience (and Gary&#8217;s quote about furthuring individuals vs. family), one has to read Richard Dawkin&#8217;s ground breaking work in 1976, She Selfish Gene, to understand why that&#8217;s the case. The book also helps explain why grandparents are often involved in bringing up their offsprings. In America, we have a highly developed, specialist-oriented post-industrial society where we outsource almost everything. The role of the family needs to be reexamined here as every service and function a family provides as an economic unit can be purchased, sometimes more cheaply, from outside. We hire nannies, send kids to schools, have a teacher/coach for anything from piano and violin and soccer, tennis, and modeling, use an entourage of gardeners, plumbers, carpenters, handymen to maintain our houses, and work with a psychiatrist because we don&#8217;t now how to discipline kids (please watch the cable show &#8220;Honey we are killing the kids&#8221;). In China, generalists still rule and women perform the many and various duties in their society.</p>
<p>Finally, what&#8217;s the meaning of life? Are advances in economics the same as advances in culture? Can a poor country develop highly advanced civilization? Can poor men (and women) be happy or happier than their richer counterparts? It&#8217;s NOT how much one makes; it&#8217;s how much one buys the many neccessities and indulgences every month and how much one saves in the end of the month that matters. $5000 a month here will leave you nothing in the end of the month (Americans savings rates are around -0.5% in 2005) while 5000RMB a month in China (RMB is a mere 1/8 of USD) will likely buy all the luxuries of a middle class living, a moderate house, a small car maybe, and a whopping 40% savings rate! So, who is richer?</p>
<p>While we are not likely to see the real China in this trip, we will experience what many Chinese experience, even though they live in the three most advanced cities, in their everyday life. We will discover how affordable life can be outside of our 4-star hotels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JingWei Xian</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2006/china/the-role-of-women-in-chinese-economic-activity/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>JingWei Xian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 07:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/2006/china/the-role-of-women-in-chinese-economic-activity/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>I forgot to mention last time. I think this has a closer relationship to the role of women in business in China. I mentioned the equality on salary last time. The equality of chance must not leave out. In terms of chance, I mean the chance of women being in the top level of business versus men. Everyone has an equal opportunity now, in terms of gener. Since the invention of online blog and forum, I've seen increasing number of female individuals claimed that they had tough time to be dated and get marry because they have a relatively high positions and income. This issued had brought attention of media as well. The reason behind this is about the Chinese tradition and culture that are hard to explain in a few words. I personally don't mind at all to have a wife that is smarter, have a higher position and income than me, but I definitely desire she is not a busy one with working so as to have a certain amout of time with the family. This is driven by the tradition and culture, but also being open minded against the tradition and culture.

Since women had been surpressed by tradition for a very long time in Chinese histroy, Chinese government created laws and policies to protect women rights. These laws and policies are being perfected while new laws and being added. Politically, there must be women representative in each part of the government. For example, Ms. Wu Yi became one of the vice presidents of China before Ms. Rice took over the secretary of state. Before being a vice president, Ms. Wu served as a top officer of department of commerce of China for a long time. In addition, Chinese women have one benefit that American women don't - a date for women, March 8. It's not a holiday, in which ladies still have to work like normal. However, companies and business (I'm not sure if foreign companies and investments do this) specially treat all their female employee. Usually women are treated a nice gathering dinner, or a cash bonus for this special day, or a one-to-two-day trip. This is how China appreciate women's contribution.

I totally agree with Elisabeth's comments. That's the main reason why I'm here with you guys. I'm the only child. It was a very tough decision for both myself and my parents to being apart for years. In order for me to be more competitive, they decided to send me away and I decided to accept their decision. I actually rejected the first time they asked, with chance I could have come 3 years earlier. The preference of a son is partly originated from the need of working power. I thing it's still be part of the reason now. The ability to carry on the family name is another main reason. This is rooted in our tradition. However, it's evidently that those who are educated and exposed to the world don't have such mind dead-set anymore. In fact, there are increasing number of people prefer a daughter now because the claim a daughter will be more closed and more likely to take care of the parents when the parents become old.

Before going to Emile's question, I would conclude that women are not discriminated in terms of their abilty to work in business in China, since they are able to receive salary as a man in the same position, as well as being able to have equal opportunity to climb up the stair. 

Emile, you're on the right track. What I meant in my last message was not to match what you may earn in China with the life expense in United State. It's very reasonable to assume that if you work in China, you're going to live in China for that period, unless it is a short term business trip or assignment. Therefore, what you earn is going to be spent at where you earn. So, $20,000 is low income in US, while 160,000RMB is considered to be high income in China.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to mention last time. I think this has a closer relationship to the role of women in business in China. I mentioned the equality on salary last time. The equality of chance must not leave out. In terms of chance, I mean the chance of women being in the top level of business versus men. Everyone has an equal opportunity now, in terms of gener. Since the invention of online blog and forum, I&#8217;ve seen increasing number of female individuals claimed that they had tough time to be dated and get marry because they have a relatively high positions and income. This issued had brought attention of media as well. The reason behind this is about the Chinese tradition and culture that are hard to explain in a few words. I personally don&#8217;t mind at all to have a wife that is smarter, have a higher position and income than me, but I definitely desire she is not a busy one with working so as to have a certain amout of time with the family. This is driven by the tradition and culture, but also being open minded against the tradition and culture.</p>
<p>Since women had been surpressed by tradition for a very long time in Chinese histroy, Chinese government created laws and policies to protect women rights. These laws and policies are being perfected while new laws and being added. Politically, there must be women representative in each part of the government. For example, Ms. Wu Yi became one of the vice presidents of China before Ms. Rice took over the secretary of state. Before being a vice president, Ms. Wu served as a top officer of department of commerce of China for a long time. In addition, Chinese women have one benefit that American women don&#8217;t - a date for women, March 8. It&#8217;s not a holiday, in which ladies still have to work like normal. However, companies and business (I&#8217;m not sure if foreign companies and investments do this) specially treat all their female employee. Usually women are treated a nice gathering dinner, or a cash bonus for this special day, or a one-to-two-day trip. This is how China appreciate women&#8217;s contribution.</p>
<p>I totally agree with Elisabeth&#8217;s comments. That&#8217;s the main reason why I&#8217;m here with you guys. I&#8217;m the only child. It was a very tough decision for both myself and my parents to being apart for years. In order for me to be more competitive, they decided to send me away and I decided to accept their decision. I actually rejected the first time they asked, with chance I could have come 3 years earlier. The preference of a son is partly originated from the need of working power. I thing it&#8217;s still be part of the reason now. The ability to carry on the family name is another main reason. This is rooted in our tradition. However, it&#8217;s evidently that those who are educated and exposed to the world don&#8217;t have such mind dead-set anymore. In fact, there are increasing number of people prefer a daughter now because the claim a daughter will be more closed and more likely to take care of the parents when the parents become old.</p>
<p>Before going to Emile&#8217;s question, I would conclude that women are not discriminated in terms of their abilty to work in business in China, since they are able to receive salary as a man in the same position, as well as being able to have equal opportunity to climb up the stair. </p>
<p>Emile, you&#8217;re on the right track. What I meant in my last message was not to match what you may earn in China with the life expense in United State. It&#8217;s very reasonable to assume that if you work in China, you&#8217;re going to live in China for that period, unless it is a short term business trip or assignment. Therefore, what you earn is going to be spent at where you earn. So, $20,000 is low income in US, while 160,000RMB is considered to be high income in China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emile Davis</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2006/china/the-role-of-women-in-chinese-economic-activity/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Emile Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 22:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/2006/china/the-role-of-women-in-chinese-economic-activity/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>JingWei:  Your post is certainly something I wouldn’t expect to find in a textbook, and I thought it was very interesting.  What is sticking out at me is the 8:1 RMB to US Dollar ratio.  I’m trying to keep your last sentence of that paragraph in mind while posting this comment.  Suppose a US resident was able to save $20,000 over the course of one year.  If this person moved to China, then (s)he would have the equivalent of 160,000RMB in China and be quite well off for the next year.  Am I on the right track, or am I comparing in the exact way that you stated was not fair?

I’m not surprised by what you said about the three wealthy cities.  I think it would be very easy for people to visit the more developed cities and assume all of China is as affluent as those cities.  I hope we will be able to see and appreciate the real parts of China.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JingWei:  Your post is certainly something I wouldn’t expect to find in a textbook, and I thought it was very interesting.  What is sticking out at me is the 8:1 RMB to US Dollar ratio.  I’m trying to keep your last sentence of that paragraph in mind while posting this comment.  Suppose a US resident was able to save $20,000 over the course of one year.  If this person moved to China, then (s)he would have the equivalent of 160,000RMB in China and be quite well off for the next year.  Am I on the right track, or am I comparing in the exact way that you stated was not fair?</p>
<p>I’m not surprised by what you said about the three wealthy cities.  I think it would be very easy for people to visit the more developed cities and assume all of China is as affluent as those cities.  I hope we will be able to see and appreciate the real parts of China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Carr</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2006/china/the-role-of-women-in-chinese-economic-activity/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Carr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 16:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/2006/china/the-role-of-women-in-chinese-economic-activity/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Hi Elizabeth.  Good post.  I was not blessing or admiring Imperialism or conquest.  Diamond's book and that chapter also does not do so.  Only suggesting that Diamond, like any good scholar, has written some stuff that makes us rethink things. E.g., which drives which - does culture drive economics, or vice versa?  Do they influence both (the gut reaction answer that most folks across the globe would give is "why, of course!"), but how does one measure such a question without selecting the dependent and independent variables that will lead to the result one naturally wants to find?  I also saw a show on TV recently where Diamond was asked how he is able to pull together so many academic disciplines in his work.  He noted how his parents were both academics and dinner conversations in his house involved professors from different disciplines and he was able to start to see at an early age connections that most don't get exposed to until later in life.  His ability to cross-pollinate academic disciplines, I believe, is the strength of his work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Elizabeth.  Good post.  I was not blessing or admiring Imperialism or conquest.  Diamond&#8217;s book and that chapter also does not do so.  Only suggesting that Diamond, like any good scholar, has written some stuff that makes us rethink things. E.g., which drives which - does culture drive economics, or vice versa?  Do they influence both (the gut reaction answer that most folks across the globe would give is &#8220;why, of course!&#8221;), but how does one measure such a question without selecting the dependent and independent variables that will lead to the result one naturally wants to find?  I also saw a show on TV recently where Diamond was asked how he is able to pull together so many academic disciplines in his work.  He noted how his parents were both academics and dinner conversations in his house involved professors from different disciplines and he was able to start to see at an early age connections that most don&#8217;t get exposed to until later in life.  His ability to cross-pollinate academic disciplines, I believe, is the strength of his work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elisabeth Suiter</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2006/china/the-role-of-women-in-chinese-economic-activity/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Elisabeth Suiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 06:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/2006/china/the-role-of-women-in-chinese-economic-activity/#comment-128</guid>
		<description>I believe you know I am a Latin American Studies undergrad, but I will resist the great temptation to write an essay here on the methods of conquest used by the Spaniards, especially since I am not familiar with the context in which it was used.  It was in fact  the Incas, and suffice to say the Conquistadores used internal conflict to their advantage, since manpower and terrain definitely was not on their side.  Anyone interested in hearing me speak for an hour, ask me about this later. (I believe Adrienne has witnessed such rants before.) For now, I suppose I will have to find that book.

The simple answer to the complex question appears to be economics.  If you have a higher earning potential than your parents, it makes sense that you would be the one working.  However, the social implications of the varying concepts of childhood and upbringing definitely would need to go much deeper then that. Thanks for the book recommendation.  Sounds like I have quite a few reasons to read that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe you know I am a Latin American Studies undergrad, but I will resist the great temptation to write an essay here on the methods of conquest used by the Spaniards, especially since I am not familiar with the context in which it was used.  It was in fact  the Incas, and suffice to say the Conquistadores used internal conflict to their advantage, since manpower and terrain definitely was not on their side.  Anyone interested in hearing me speak for an hour, ask me about this later. (I believe Adrienne has witnessed such rants before.) For now, I suppose I will have to find that book.</p>
<p>The simple answer to the complex question appears to be economics.  If you have a higher earning potential than your parents, it makes sense that you would be the one working.  However, the social implications of the varying concepts of childhood and upbringing definitely would need to go much deeper then that. Thanks for the book recommendation.  Sounds like I have quite a few reasons to read that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Carr</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2006/china/the-role-of-women-in-chinese-economic-activity/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Carr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 01:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/2006/china/the-role-of-women-in-chinese-economic-activity/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>Jarod Diamond, a noted scholar at UCLA who I believe is a cultural anthropologist (not sure of that point as my memory is foggy), has written on the role that grandparents play in raising children in other cultures. See, e.g., his Pulitzer prize winning multidisciplinary focused book, "Guns, Germs and Steel."  What I appreciate about his work is that he often starts by asking what appears to be a mundane question but upon closer review it becomes anything but a simple question. His "Guns, Germs and Steel" book starts with the question he was asked on a beach in New Guinea one day by a local man named Yali: "Why do so many Western countries have more 'cargo' than other countries and cultures?"   With "cargo", of course, being a metaphor for wealth, insitutional development, etc. (one could even argue in the context of this discussion thread it equates to day care resources and opportunities).  He admits in Chapter One of his book that he did not have a clue re: how to respond to Yali that day on the beach, and hence his journey to explore this complex question began with the writing of his Guns, Germs and Steel book.  My point is that the answer to the question of "why do grandparents in one culture take care of children and not in another?" is probably far more complex than one would guess at first blush.  As an aside, one chapter in Diamond's book that I remember being a page turner was about how the explorer/conquistador Pizarro and about 100 of his men faced off against over 30,000 Incas (Aztecs? Mayans?) and won the battle in about 15 minutes. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jarod Diamond, a noted scholar at UCLA who I believe is a cultural anthropologist (not sure of that point as my memory is foggy), has written on the role that grandparents play in raising children in other cultures. See, e.g., his Pulitzer prize winning multidisciplinary focused book, &#8220;Guns, Germs and Steel.&#8221;  What I appreciate about his work is that he often starts by asking what appears to be a mundane question but upon closer review it becomes anything but a simple question. His &#8220;Guns, Germs and Steel&#8221; book starts with the question he was asked on a beach in New Guinea one day by a local man named Yali: &#8220;Why do so many Western countries have more &#8216;cargo&#8217; than other countries and cultures?&#8221;   With &#8220;cargo&#8221;, of course, being a metaphor for wealth, insitutional development, etc. (one could even argue in the context of this discussion thread it equates to day care resources and opportunities).  He admits in Chapter One of his book that he did not have a clue re: how to respond to Yali that day on the beach, and hence his journey to explore this complex question began with the writing of his Guns, Germs and Steel book.  My point is that the answer to the question of &#8220;why do grandparents in one culture take care of children and not in another?&#8221; is probably far more complex than one would guess at first blush.  As an aside, one chapter in Diamond&#8217;s book that I remember being a page turner was about how the explorer/conquistador Pizarro and about 100 of his men faced off against over 30,000 Incas (Aztecs? Mayans?) and won the battle in about 15 minutes. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

