Uuuhh, Beavis, Tell Me Again — How Much Is 1.07 Trillion Dollars?

March 3rd, 2007

Uuuhh, I think it’s a lot.  Wikipedia said it’s more than $2.37. 

As a follow up to Professor Ramezani’s session with us, read this recent Wall Street Journal article [subscription may be required], “China May Get More Daring With Its $1.07 Trillion Stash.

Per this article, China is looking at new ways of managing its investments in the US that he spoke about – fewer purchases of U.S. Treasury bonds and more buying of riskier investments such as corporate bonds, stocks, real estate and/or commodities.

What does this mean for the U.S.? Per Professor Ramezani’s talk, is this a good or bad development for the US? And what business opportunities might this shift in Chinese investing present for YOU?

And for an article on “the man” in China who gets to decide how to spend this money, click on this Wall Street Journal article (”Beijing Taps Top Official To Invest Its Cash Stash“).  Note that he does not have a PhD in finance or economics; a masters degree.  This was suprising to me given much of Asia’s fixation with perception, formality and high levels of education (e.g., PhD from a Tier 1 Western Univesity preferred for top positions; others need not apply, etc.).   Then again, both Chairman Mao and Deng Xiaoping were peasants and did not come from the bourgeoise.



Entry Filed under: Pre-Departure, China, Misc.

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. Kerry Huang  |  March 5th, 2007 at 2:37 pm

    The article implies that interest rates might go up with the shift of money into stocks & bonds instead of US Treasury bonds. Maybe this move will wake up Congress to control our government’s debt. At the same time China’s riskier stock investments will depend on the US economy more than when China only invested in treasury bonds. This will only intertwine our economies even more. I don’t know if it is bad, good, or neutral but the Chinese will want to watch our economy more than ever if they proceed with the plan. One aspect is that it is good because then the Chinese will be less inclined to engage in policies that are very hurtful for our economy.

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Calendar

May 2012
M T W T F S S
« Mar    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Most Recent Posts

The posts, comments and/or views expressed on this trip blog, whether by a Cal Poly student or faculty or an outside guest to the blog, do not necessarily reflect the policies or views of Cal Poly, the Orfalea College of Business (OCOB), any of the OCOB's graduate programs and/or other students who participate in the trip.