China or India? … And Follow Up Questions?
November 6th, 2007
Submitted by: Gary Chou
This is a summary of the journal article, China and India: The Reality Beyond the Hype – a research paper written by Deloitte Research, a subsidiary of Deloitte Consulting.
[Prof. Carr Addendum: Gary's post is a good post that's relevant to our session last Friday. If you have further follow-up questions for Dr. Morris or Dr. Singh, please make a comment below and pose the question. If the number of questions is manageable, I will email them and ask them to jump in and try to respond to all or some of them.]
*** *** ***
We learned last Friday that China and India have been the richest nations with advanced technology for the most part of human history. Yet this changed dramatically as these two countries took a backseat in recent 200 years. Today, China and India seem to be promising grounds for the future of a globalized economy. As emerging business leaders, we shall look at these countries side-by-side so to better understand their growth potential and business environments.
Introduction
Why did the price of oil and other commodities rise in the last five years? Why is the US able to fund a massive external deficit without an increase in interest rates? Why have global prices of manufactured products declined in the past decade relatives to other goods or services? China had played an important role in these questions.
Being the second largest oil consumer, China has contributed to higher oil prices. By linking its currency to US Dollars, in terms heavily undervaluing its Yuan, has accumulated US external [trade] deficit. Its massive investment in manufacturing capacity also drives down production margin. As India goes through a similar path, do these two countries which represent 40% of the world’s population and 25% of global GDP, have the same business environment? If not, how are they different? As a prudent investor or global businessman, what shall we know about their comparative advantages? How shall we leverage their traits to our advantages?
Answers to these questions are crucial, therefore you must read on.
Sources of Growth
Economic growth is driven in large part by investment in capital. China is a richer country due to having higher investment. However, China has a lower return-on-investment (ROI) because of an inefficient market.
China has invested far more than India. Between 1994-2004, Chinese investment accounted 37.5% of GDP verses 22.5% in India. China has higher investment because of higher level of personal and government saving and a much higher foreign capital inflow. For example, China saved 39.7% of GDP while India saved 21.9% of GDP.
With such high investment rate however, China should boast even higher growth rate than observed. China’s ROI is hampered by an inefficient financial intermediation. Much of China’s investment was undertaken by state-run companies borrowing from state-run banks. By making investments decisions basis on political goals, it goes without saying that markets allocate resources more efficiently than governments.
Doing Business in China and India
Comparing these two countries, China seems to be favored over India. In addition to a higher cost of doing business in India than China (according to a World Bank report), several other factors are considered:
Infrastructure
In 2002 China spent US $128 billion on power and transport infrastructure compared to US$18 billion for India. China’s highway network amounts to 1.4 million kilometers compared to 200 thousands kilometers of India. Also, due to insufficient port capacity, the lead time for Indian exports to the US is roughly three to four times greater than Chinese exports. In fact, according to a commentary in Asia Times, a cargo that takes six days to travel from Singapore to Mumbai could sit in the port for 30 days before it is unloaded. The reason is that there is insufficient capacity to service today’s large cargo ships at Indian ports. The global shipping industry has undergone a technological revolution in which India has been a minor participant.
Regulatory Issues
Although India has promulgated considerable deregulation, there remain many laws that are a legacy of its socialist past. Labor laws designed to protect workers have the effect of discouraging new employment. The Industrial Disputes Act says that companies with more than 100 employees require government permission to dismiss workers. Workers also cannot work more than 75 hours of overtime per year.
China’s labor on the other hand is lenient and most of the time easily bypassed. Chinese factory workers easily work 12 hours a day, far more than the 8 hours day for Indian factories.
In terms of retailing, China has recently ended most restrictions on retailing and is experiencing massive investment in modernization of the retail sector. Not so India. There, foreign investment is mostly banned and local retailers remained very small by global standards. The result is a highly fragmented industry with inefficient distribution. As we know, this discourages the economics of scale.
In terms of trade barriers, India has lowered the average tariff from 56% in 1990 to 28% in 2004, while China has dropped from 32% to 6% in the same period. A huge difference in any regard.
Demographics
China’s demographic is not so much different than those leading developing countries. Aging population with little young people observed commonly in Germany and Japan is also commonplace in China, due to its one-child policy. India on the other hand has a much younger population which translates to a window of opportunity for a few decades that its labor force will accelerate in growth. This depends crucially on the economic flexibility to allow for the creation of millions of new jobs.
China also has a more literature population: 15% of China’s population aged 18-23 is enrolled in college while 7% is in India. 91% of Chinese adults are literate versus 61% of India. Among females, the numbers are 87% and 45% respectively. In China, there are 18 students per teacher versus 24 in India. China also spends more money on R&D, has greater ubiquity of computers and internet users, and publishes more articles in scientific and technical journals.
On the other hand, India has a great advantage when it comes to exporting services. That is the high number of fluent English speakers. Yet China’s government has decreed that all students must study English after the age of five.
Manufacturing
The average monthly wages in manufacturing in India is $28 while China is $110. Combining a more skilled workforce and a much higher wages in manufacturing, the production of low-value-added goods is likely to become prohibitive for China. On the other hand, India is likely to move toward the direction of becoming a manufacturing hub.
The Future of China and India
* Both will grow rapidly, taking a much larger share of global GDP. Yet for the foreseeable future, China is likely to grow much faster.
* The division of labor between India and China will become blurred as both countries excel in services and manufacturing.
* Trade between the two will expand, enabling companies in both countries to achieve critical mass. For global companies selling in these countries, this means more local competition.
* Both countries, while remaining relatively poor, will experience rapid growth of the middle class, creating vast new opportunities for Western companies to sell in those markets.
Entry Filed under: Pre-Departure, China, India, Pre-Departure
4 Comments Add your own
1. Alex Thornton | December 11th, 2009 at 4:53 pm
The original PDF appears to be gone now. This appears to be the same document.
One major thing that I noticed is that you really have to look at the graphs in the PDF to get a feel for the past 300 years of economic history. For example, the chart entitled “Historical share of global GDP” Shows how the US went from 0% of global GDP to over 25% after WWII. Meanwhile, China and India went from nearly 25% each to less than 5% each.
The section “Sources of Growth” debunks the idea that “China’s authoritarianism allows the government to make quick, unpopular decisions that are more difficult and time consuming in democratic India,” by claiming that “many democracies have performed exceptionally well (Japan, Ireland) while many authoritarian countries have sunk into poverty and despair (Soviet Union, much of Africa and the Middle East).”
The belief that democracies and capitalism are always better than authoritarian governments is a generalization. In fact, the effectiveness of an authoritarian governments is based on the ability of its leader(s). If an authoritarian government has good leadership, it can preform much more effectively than a capitalist democracy.
The trouble, of course, occurs when the effective leaders are replaced by new ones. In a democracy, new leaders tend to be as effective as the previous ones and there is little or no bloodshed. In contrast, Authoritarian transitions of power tend to start civil wars and the new leaders are typically good at ceasing power, but not government administration.
Though it is improbable that China has had high quality leadership continuously for 30 years now, it is by no means impossible.
2. Yuxiang Gao | March 8th, 2010 at 10:04 am
China and India provide vast opportunities for trade and investments in all major sectors including information and communication technologies, energy, chemicals, natural resources, textiles, metals.
Global companies can benefit from large and skilled, yet comparatively low-cost human resources for the entire spectrum of activities
Further, doing business in China and India is not without risks. There are many challenges and risks spanning infrastructural, social, cultural, political, regulatory, intellectual property, and labor laws.
As what Alex mentioned, the effectiveness of an authoritarian government is based on the ability of its leader(s). If an authoritarian government has good leadership, it can preform much more effectively than a capitalist democracy.
I totally agree with this point. In addition, Authoritarian government is very helpful when facing some serious crisis.
3. Jordan Wente | March 18th, 2010 at 12:58 pm
I agree with you both that an authoritarian government is very effective in certain situations. This has been proven by China’s ability to grow so rapidly and make the tough decisions that enabled this growth. I also believe that in a time of crisis people look to the government to handle crisis. Authoritarian governments can be very effective in these situations. We have experienced crisis here in the United States where the citizens look to the government to handle the situation and hand over more power to the government to deal with the crisis. This happened in tough economic times through out US history and even more recently after 9/11. So we can see how helpful an authoritarian style government can be however it comes at a cost. I think the major point that is being stressed in China is not an ineffective government but rather the risk of political instability arising from the citizens. Effectiveness does depend on the leaders but there are still many political risks that remain. I do not in any way agree that democracies and capitalism are the best way but I do think that in the long run India will be better off. However, this depends on if the country can find a way to get over some of the hurdles of democracy and continue to grow. The social contract implied between the government and the citizens will remain an important aspect of continued stability and prosperity in both countries. The inefficiencies India has to overcome, as noted in the blog post, are going to become very crucial to its overall economic success. India has many advantages that have helped the country grow and I think they will continue to lead the country to a bright future.
4. Leslie Mann | March 19th, 2010 at 12:31 am
As Alex pointed out, it is interesting to see the graph on the growth and decline of the share of Global GDP since the 17th century. More interesting to note too is how this graph will appear in the next 25-50 years. I imagine it will be a much more leveled playing field.
China takes the lead in just about everything over India. From investment expenditures to literacy rates, it seems Chins will always be ahead and India will always be struggling to catch up; just as the US economy has risen to superpower status, and just as we are seeing now, it’s slow decline from that podium, China’s growth will, someday taper off. India should be proud of its second place standing. Most people don’t view taking second with much pride but lest we forget that India’s democratic government is just 60 years young, and in a relatively short amount of time, the economy and the opportunity for its citizens to succeed have come a long way. India, in this respect is like a young child, ambitious, dedicated and willing to take risks. China, the seasoned adolescent is prideful and aggressive and if not paying close attention, may see the young child finish first after all. An article from last June 2009 states, “The World Bank has projected (in its Global Development Finance Report) that the Indian economy will grow at 8% in 2010, which would make it the fastest-growing economy in the world for the first time, surpassing China, which is projected to grow at 7.7% rate.”
For the full article: http://seekingalpha.com/article/145032-india-projected-to-be-the-fastest-growing-economy-in-2010
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed