Submitted by: David Caldwell

I came across a rather depressing piece while browsing the internet: an exposé about an Indian worker named Rewa Ram, entitled “My life cleaning Delhi’s sewers.” The article describes the job of one of India’s lower castes: the untouchables, or “Dalits.” While just reading about Ram’s experience is enough to induce nausea, he says “I am not educated, I come from a very poor family of untouchables. What else can I expect…At least I have a government job and I am able to feed my children. I get into this hell every day but then this is my job…I live smelling death, but it is fine.”

Ram’s response seems of indicative of a glass ceiling above the lower classes. When I started to think more in depth about what kinds of influences were keeping the Dalits down, I realized that I had almost no understanding of the caste system or social stratification – it’s just not something that I’ve ever had a lot of exposure to. This is why I’m so excited about getting to go to India to learn about their society first-hand.

Related to the previous article, I stumbled across another piece that caught my interest: a Fora.tv video about The Privatization of Water. While I don’t claim to be any sort of environmental advocate, one part of this video caught my attention. Alan Snitow talks briefly about how much more expensive bottled water is than municipal water sources, but American consumer guilt isn’t what he’s interested in. At 00:35:45 into the talk, he mentions that the “real problem [he] sees with bottled water is best seen in other parts of the world.” Specifically, he observes than in India, the middle and upper classes drink bottled water because there is a perception that the municipal water supply is unhealthy. As a result, the only support for improving public water systems comes from the country’s poorest citizens – essentially limiting their access to clean, affordable water by robbing them of any sort of political clout.

Snitow chastises the privatization of water sources all over the world by companies such as Nestle, Coca Cola, and Pepsi. This grates harshly against my experiences with business and education – until now, I’ve been a staunch believer that private industry was the best way to get many things done; after all, competition brings out the best in people, right? When I’m talking to my friends about a poor performance or a substandard service, I often jokingly say that “it’s good enough for government work!”

To reconcile these two conflicting ideas, I’ll have to think back to our Macro Economics course (GSB 533) last spring, in which Dr. Marlow taught us that when governments create restrictions and incentives in markets, they may achieve certain social objectives, but it won’t be as efficient an allocation of resources to their highest value uses as if the government had embraced a laissez-faire attitude. I appreciate that at the end of the day, we didn’t learn whether governmental intervention was right or wrong, but that it was up to us to decide what we thought was the most important, and to act accordingly to pursue those goals. As it pertains to Rewa Ram, it’s up to the Indian government to decide whether or not it wants to resist foreign and domestic investment in municipal replacements at the cost of efficiency, or if it wants to embrace them at the cost of its most destitute people.