<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Issue of Surrogacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://calpolymbatrip.com/2010/india/the-issue-of-surrogacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2010/india/the-issue-of-surrogacy/</link>
	<description>The MBA Graduate Program at Cal Poly</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 21:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frederick Peemoeller</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2010/india/the-issue-of-surrogacy/#comment-17791</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederick Peemoeller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/?p=2326#comment-17791</guid>
		<description>I actually wonder more about the political and greed aspect of these ventures than the ethical ones. Imagine if surrogacy in India becomes more widespread. Since they are born in India, these children are citizens, and they are born from the womb of an Indian woman. I am sure it is difficult for any woman to give up a child even though it is not hers, and since these women supposedly cannot have children it gives them more of an incentive to try to keep them. Who is to say that they cannot? What rights do foreign tourists have to try to take their babies away? Wouldn't the Indian government catch on to this investment and try to add on a tariff or tax for exporting babies out of their country? I could definitely see this subject being an issue not just ethically, but also politically as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually wonder more about the political and greed aspect of these ventures than the ethical ones. Imagine if surrogacy in India becomes more widespread. Since they are born in India, these children are citizens, and they are born from the womb of an Indian woman. I am sure it is difficult for any woman to give up a child even though it is not hers, and since these women supposedly cannot have children it gives them more of an incentive to try to keep them. Who is to say that they cannot? What rights do foreign tourists have to try to take their babies away? Wouldn&#8217;t the Indian government catch on to this investment and try to add on a tariff or tax for exporting babies out of their country? I could definitely see this subject being an issue not just ethically, but also politically as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle Steussy</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2010/india/the-issue-of-surrogacy/#comment-17553</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle Steussy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 02:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/?p=2326#comment-17553</guid>
		<description>I suppose I don't see this as empowering or exploiting women in India but rather giving them an opportunity for a better life and a much-wanted baby for those couples who are unfortunately unable to conceive. Ultimately, this clinic and others like it allow a woman to have what she otherwise cannot do for herself in a safe environment.

I do agree with John, however, that there is potential for women to be exploited and used in these situations by greedy people who want to make a buck for themselves. Unfortunately, this happens all the time and the solution may just lie in stricter regulations or creating different incentives other than money for these women such as a safe haven, daily necessities or education. Either way, I think we have to realize that there is potential for unethical behavior and instead of pretending the problem isn't there, find an appropriate solution that promotes responsible behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose I don&#8217;t see this as empowering or exploiting women in India but rather giving them an opportunity for a better life and a much-wanted baby for those couples who are unfortunately unable to conceive. Ultimately, this clinic and others like it allow a woman to have what she otherwise cannot do for herself in a safe environment.</p>
<p>I do agree with John, however, that there is potential for women to be exploited and used in these situations by greedy people who want to make a buck for themselves. Unfortunately, this happens all the time and the solution may just lie in stricter regulations or creating different incentives other than money for these women such as a safe haven, daily necessities or education. Either way, I think we have to realize that there is potential for unethical behavior and instead of pretending the problem isn&#8217;t there, find an appropriate solution that promotes responsible behavior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Barry</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2010/india/the-issue-of-surrogacy/#comment-17548</link>
		<dc:creator>John Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/?p=2326#comment-17548</guid>
		<description>I see absolutely nothing wrong with Indian women choosing to carry someone else's baby for profit.  If doing this will allow them to give their children a better life then I'm all for it.  My only concern is that these women are being paid very large sums of money by Indian standards, and this runs the risk of attracting unwanted attention from people looking to exploit the system by essentially "pimping" out women, taking their money, and turning them into baby factories regardless of how they may feel about it so as to get their cut.  Doctor Patel, however, seems to have an answer to this by not only being very selective about who she picks as surrogates, but by also holding onto their $5,500 fee until they are ready to put it towards something, rather than just setting them loose with a ton of cash and a bright red bull's eye on their back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see absolutely nothing wrong with Indian women choosing to carry someone else&#8217;s baby for profit.  If doing this will allow them to give their children a better life then I&#8217;m all for it.  My only concern is that these women are being paid very large sums of money by Indian standards, and this runs the risk of attracting unwanted attention from people looking to exploit the system by essentially &#8220;pimping&#8221; out women, taking their money, and turning them into baby factories regardless of how they may feel about it so as to get their cut.  Doctor Patel, however, seems to have an answer to this by not only being very selective about who she picks as surrogates, but by also holding onto their $5,500 fee until they are ready to put it towards something, rather than just setting them loose with a ton of cash and a bright red bull&#8217;s eye on their back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Ary</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2010/india/the-issue-of-surrogacy/#comment-17525</link>
		<dc:creator>William Ary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/?p=2326#comment-17525</guid>
		<description>This is typical of all ethical dilemmas. The issue is that people are doing something for money that others think should not be done for money. This is a result of two different value sets and two different economic circumstances. I think it is unfortunate, the economics are hard to refute. I know some people who are surrogates in the US and they simply need the money more than they need room in their uteruses, so I assume the same is even more true in India. 

Personally, I think people have the right to use their bodies to do whatever they want, as long as they don't hurt anyone. Naysayers have no right to tell them what they should do or say that they know better. All we can do is educate the women so that they can make their own decisions. The real ethical problem I have with baby outsourcing is that people are trying to foist their own morality on others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is typical of all ethical dilemmas. The issue is that people are doing something for money that others think should not be done for money. This is a result of two different value sets and two different economic circumstances. I think it is unfortunate, the economics are hard to refute. I know some people who are surrogates in the US and they simply need the money more than they need room in their uteruses, so I assume the same is even more true in India. </p>
<p>Personally, I think people have the right to use their bodies to do whatever they want, as long as they don&#8217;t hurt anyone. Naysayers have no right to tell them what they should do or say that they know better. All we can do is educate the women so that they can make their own decisions. The real ethical problem I have with baby outsourcing is that people are trying to foist their own morality on others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily Schaapveld</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2010/india/the-issue-of-surrogacy/#comment-17522</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily Schaapveld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/?p=2326#comment-17522</guid>
		<description>Very interesting article.  You asked if there should more regulation in this potentially growing market and my opinion is absolutely.  However, as for the couple using the surrogate, they would be wise to do all of their research on the clinic and then more.  Just because a clinic claims to be following regulations, it does not mean that it has not found ways to get through loopholes with lower standards.  

In response to your question about empowering women or exploiting them, I feel that as long as surrogacy is not forced upon any of the women, then it is empowering them.  In a country flooded with poverty, mothers must realize opportunities to break the cycle for their families.  If being a surrogate mother allows one women to send her children to college and another women to experience the joys of motherhood, then the practice is a blessing for both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting article.  You asked if there should more regulation in this potentially growing market and my opinion is absolutely.  However, as for the couple using the surrogate, they would be wise to do all of their research on the clinic and then more.  Just because a clinic claims to be following regulations, it does not mean that it has not found ways to get through loopholes with lower standards.  </p>
<p>In response to your question about empowering women or exploiting them, I feel that as long as surrogacy is not forced upon any of the women, then it is empowering them.  In a country flooded with poverty, mothers must realize opportunities to break the cycle for their families.  If being a surrogate mother allows one women to send her children to college and another women to experience the joys of motherhood, then the practice is a blessing for both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surrogacy in India</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2010/india/the-issue-of-surrogacy/#comment-17386</link>
		<dc:creator>Surrogacy in India</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/?p=2326#comment-17386</guid>
		<description>This was a wonderful opertunity for the mothers who could not able to give birth.Thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a wonderful opertunity for the mothers who could not able to give birth.Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk Story</title>
		<link>http://calpolymbatrip.com/2010/india/the-issue-of-surrogacy/#comment-17379</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk Story</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 02:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpolymbatrip.com/?p=2326#comment-17379</guid>
		<description>Interesting post Lindsay.  The questions at the end of your post provide food for thought. Using your questions, reply’s have been crafted in coherence with my personal worldview which is simply that- one worldview.

With an increasing amount of surrogate pregnancies in India, should there be more regulation to ensure protection for the surrogates?  Yes, it appears that regulation in the surrogate business can’t hurt.  The ‘greed-ethic’, not the ‘care ethic,’ prevails in our current model of capitalism.  As we have observed in the subprime debacle or the suddenly righteous US  health insurance industry, it’s only a matter of time/money before humans lose sight of basic values- like  goodwill of their fellow citizens, and begin to imagine all the precious trinkets they may stuff in their pockets.  Due to the delicate circumstances of surrogate pregnancies, it only seems appropriate to regulate a potential ‘free-market’ surrogate dealer from getting out of hand.  Judging by your article, Dr. Patel would not have any hang-ups with these regulations. 

Is it really exploiting Indian women or empowering them?  If it continues to grow, is there a chance that it could exploit Indian women? Is this an abuse of power and money, or a way to create a mutually beneficial relationship? The warranted response to all three of your final questions is the same.  Exploitation or empowerment rests in the implementation of a proper standard of conduct in the surrogate business.  Mutually beneficial outcomes are attainable if the greed ethic does not prevail in the surrogate  marketplace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post Lindsay.  The questions at the end of your post provide food for thought. Using your questions, reply’s have been crafted in coherence with my personal worldview which is simply that- one worldview.</p>
<p>With an increasing amount of surrogate pregnancies in India, should there be more regulation to ensure protection for the surrogates?  Yes, it appears that regulation in the surrogate business can’t hurt.  The ‘greed-ethic’, not the ‘care ethic,’ prevails in our current model of capitalism.  As we have observed in the subprime debacle or the suddenly righteous US  health insurance industry, it’s only a matter of time/money before humans lose sight of basic values- like  goodwill of their fellow citizens, and begin to imagine all the precious trinkets they may stuff in their pockets.  Due to the delicate circumstances of surrogate pregnancies, it only seems appropriate to regulate a potential ‘free-market’ surrogate dealer from getting out of hand.  Judging by your article, Dr. Patel would not have any hang-ups with these regulations. </p>
<p>Is it really exploiting Indian women or empowering them?  If it continues to grow, is there a chance that it could exploit Indian women? Is this an abuse of power and money, or a way to create a mutually beneficial relationship? The warranted response to all three of your final questions is the same.  Exploitation or empowerment rests in the implementation of a proper standard of conduct in the surrogate business.  Mutually beneficial outcomes are attainable if the greed ethic does not prevail in the surrogate  marketplace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

